Sunday, March 28, 2004
The Real "Enemy" of Islam: There are actually two orders of enemies of Islam. The first order of enemies are the Islamo-Fascists who murder women and children in the name of Islam, in the name of Mohammed, in the name of Palestine, in the name of Arafat, in the name of Arab unity, or in the name of Hamas. These thugs and murderers are stirring world-wide anti-Arab and anti-Islamic anger and are putting the very existence of Islam in danger.
The second order of enemies of Islam are the Imams, the Clerics, and all other good Muslims and Arabs who sit quietly by, refusing to condemn the Islamo-fascists. By their silence, they give legitimacy to the murder of women and children in the name of Islam and they endorse the mindless violence.
Yes, I agree that Islam has very clear enemies, but they are not "The West", and they are most certainly not America, a country dedicated to the free practice of all religions. The enemies are within and if Islam and the Arab world do not take real action to halt the Islamo-Fascists, there is a real risk of a worldwide backlash against all of Islam, not just the radicals.
The second order of enemies of Islam are the Imams, the Clerics, and all other good Muslims and Arabs who sit quietly by, refusing to condemn the Islamo-fascists. By their silence, they give legitimacy to the murder of women and children in the name of Islam and they endorse the mindless violence.
Yes, I agree that Islam has very clear enemies, but they are not "The West", and they are most certainly not America, a country dedicated to the free practice of all religions. The enemies are within and if Islam and the Arab world do not take real action to halt the Islamo-Fascists, there is a real risk of a worldwide backlash against all of Islam, not just the radicals.
Saturday, March 27, 2004
Richard Clarke: Mr. Clarke's actions can be described accurately as: Exploiting 9/11 for political gain and financial profit. 'nuf said....
Sunday, March 21, 2004
State of the Democrats Part VI: John Kerry sent fired ex-general Wes Clark to Fox News Channel on 21 March to exploit 9/11 on behalf of the Kerry Campaign. It should be even more clear that the fired ex-general is one of the biggest idiots to grace the political landscape because during the interview, he got the name of his own book wrong. He cited "Winning Modern War" during the interview when the actual title of his book is "Waging Modern War".
It's apparent that Kerry and the democrats will continue to exploit 9/11 for political gains, but you'd think they wouldn't send out fools and buffoons as surrogates to carry the message.....
It's apparent that Kerry and the democrats will continue to exploit 9/11 for political gains, but you'd think they wouldn't send out fools and buffoons as surrogates to carry the message.....
Sunday, March 14, 2004
Murder for Prisoners in Spain?: Now that Al Qaeda knows they can force their will on the voters of Spain, how many will they (Al Qaeda) have to murder to force the new government to release the five prisoners captured after the bombings? The voters have said in no uncertain terms that murderers can get their way in Spain by engaging in mass death, so how long will it take for Al Qaeda or ETA demand the release of the prisoners? Hum......?
Spain Surrenders Their Foreign Policy: Spain today surrendered their foreign policy to Al Qaeda when they elected the government of Al Qaeda's choosing. Al Qaeda desired that Spain cool their relations with the U.S. and to make the point, they murdered 200 innocent women, children, and men. The people of Spain wait now to hear the next policy that Al Qaeda would like to them implement.
P.S. If Spain pulls their troops out of Iraq, it will totally negate the sacrifice that the Spanish soldiers there have made. Their service and the deaths of those who died in Iraq will have been for no reason at all if their new Al Qaeda-run government forces their withdrawal.
P.S. If Spain pulls their troops out of Iraq, it will totally negate the sacrifice that the Spanish soldiers there have made. Their service and the deaths of those who died in Iraq will have been for no reason at all if their new Al Qaeda-run government forces their withdrawal.
Spanish Voters Jeopardize Free Nations Everywhere: The message sent to terrorists in today's election in Spain was a very simple message- terrorists that wish to influence the outcome of an election need only murder as many of that nation's people as possible in order to get their way. Every free nation that holds free and open elections are now threatened with mass murder as Al Qaeda proved today that they can terrorize the voters into providing the desired outcome. Congratulations voters of Spain! It's quite a dangerous position in which you've placed the entire free world!
HEADLINE: Al Qaeda Wins In Spain!- A late entry into the Spanish elections, Al Qaeda pulls off an impressive victory. Their brief campaign was based on their primary platform- murder and hate. They were able to capitalize on their latest "Murder for Mohammed" operation where they murdered 200 innocent women, children, and men last week in Spain. Today, voters in Spain rewarded their effort and voted in the government that Al Qaeda prefers.
Letter to the voters in Spain: Dear voters, please remember now that you have rewarded Al Qaeda, you have given them precedence. Next time they want something from you, the good people of Spain, they know that all they need to do is murder enough of your citizens and you will be more than eager to hand it to them. Congratulations on your new partnership!
Letter to the voters in Spain: Dear voters, please remember now that you have rewarded Al Qaeda, you have given them precedence. Next time they want something from you, the good people of Spain, they know that all they need to do is murder enough of your citizens and you will be more than eager to hand it to them. Congratulations on your new partnership!
Saturday, March 06, 2004
President Bush and Iraq: This item is going around in e-mail, but I thought I'd publish it a little more widely:
1. FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us. Japan
did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost. This is an average of
112,500 per year.
2. Truman finished that war and started one in Korea. North Korea
never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost. This is an
average of 18,333 per year.
3. John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never
attacked us.
4. Lyndon Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. >From 1965-1975,
58,000 lives were lost. This is an average of 5,800 per year.
5. Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia
never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter
three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on
multiple occasions.
6. In the 2+ years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has
liberated two countries and crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put
nuclear inspectors in Libya, Iran and North Korea without firing a
shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. We
lost 600 soldiers, an average of 30 a year. Bush did all of this abroad
while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
WORST PRESIDENT IN HISTORY? COME ON!
1. FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us. Japan
did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost. This is an average of
112,500 per year.
2. Truman finished that war and started one in Korea. North Korea
never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost. This is an
average of 18,333 per year.
3. John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never
attacked us.
4. Lyndon Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. >From 1965-1975,
58,000 lives were lost. This is an average of 5,800 per year.
5. Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia
never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter
three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on
multiple occasions.
6. In the 2+ years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has
liberated two countries and crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put
nuclear inspectors in Libya, Iran and North Korea without firing a
shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. We
lost 600 soldiers, an average of 30 a year. Bush did all of this abroad
while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
WORST PRESIDENT IN HISTORY? COME ON!
Thursday, March 04, 2004
The Democrats on Iraq and WMD: Some history the Democrats would like you to forget as we evaluate President Bush and the decision to go to war in Iraq-
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That
is our bottom line"
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is
clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of
mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great
deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use
nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest
security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten
time since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass
destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI),
Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry( D - MA), and others Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and
he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D,CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear
programs continue at apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In
addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of
an illicit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the
United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others,
December 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the
means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is
in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27,2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports
indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I
believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real
and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
weapons within the next five years .. We also should remember we have always
underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years,
every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and
destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has
refused to do"
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show
that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He
has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda
members.. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue
to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will
keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10,2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Bob Graham (D,FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ...And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit
and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of
Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real"
Sen John F. Kerry (D, MA),Jan.23. 2003
SO NOW THESE SAME DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED-- THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION-- AND HE TOOK US TO WAR UNNECESSARILY!
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That
is our bottom line"
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is
clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of
mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great
deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use
nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest
security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten
time since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass
destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI),
Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry( D - MA), and others Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and
he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D,CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear
programs continue at apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In
addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of
an illicit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the
United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others,
December 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the
means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is
in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27,2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports
indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I
believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real
and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
weapons within the next five years .. We also should remember we have always
underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years,
every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and
destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has
refused to do"
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show
that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He
has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda
members.. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue
to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will
keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10,2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Bob Graham (D,FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ...And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit
and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of
Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real"
Sen John F. Kerry (D, MA),Jan.23. 2003
SO NOW THESE SAME DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED-- THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION-- AND HE TOOK US TO WAR UNNECESSARILY!
